setHedgingMode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only indicates a state change but does not disclose side effects, reversibility, permissions needed, or any other behavioral traits. With no annotations, the description carries full burden for transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle with one enum parameter, the description provides the core function. However, it lacks context about the meaning of 'PM include spot hedging mode' and any prerequisites, making it minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description indirectly explains the parameter by stating enable/disable, which aligns with the ON/OFF enum. Though schema coverage is 0%, the parameter name and enum values make the meaning clear, and the description adds context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (enable/disable) and the target resource (PM include spot hedging mode). It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like setMarginMode, but the jargon may confuse agents unfamiliar with trading terminology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or scenarios where the tool is or is not appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.