subscribeInsurance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'subscribe' but does not describe the subscription behavior (e.g., push vs. poll, duration, how to stop, data format). This is insufficient for a subscription tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase, which is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks the detail needed to be useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a subscription tool with three parameters and no output schema, the description provides almost no context. It fails to explain what the subscription returns, how the parameters affect behavior, or any operational aspects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning no parameter descriptions exist in the schema. The description adds no explanation for any of the three parameters ('coin', 'messageCount', 'timeoutMs'). This is a critical gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '订阅保险基金数据' translates to 'subscribe to insurance fund data', which clearly identifies the operation (subscribe) and resource (insurance fund data). However, among the many sibling subscription tools (e.g., subscribeAdlAlert, subscribeDcp), it does not differentiate what 'insurance fund data' specifically entails, reducing clarity in context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many other subscription tools. No mention of prerequisites, typical use cases, or conditions for subscribing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.