getTokenProduct

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions rate limit and auth, but there is ambiguity about 'user's FlexibleSaving balance' given 'No authentication required' – it's unclear how user-specific data is accessed without authentication. This lack of clarity lowers transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences, front-loading the purpose. The rate limit and auth info are included without excess. Could be slightly more structured, but it's efficient and no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), the description covers the basic purpose, rate limit, and auth. However, it fails to explain the user-specific data without auth and does not describe the response format, leaving some gaps. It is moderately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 1 parameter (coin) with 0% description coverage. The description does not add any information about the parameter, even though the enum limits to 'BYUSDT'. It fails to compensate for the low coverage, leaving the parameter undocumented in prose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'Query BYUSDT Token product details' and lists specific fields (FlexibleSaving balance, remaining quota, APR), making the purpose specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like getTokenPosition or getTokenDailyYield.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides rate limit and auth requirements ('No authentication required'), but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other getToken* tools or getProduct tools). The usage context is implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.