CoinConvertLimitQuery

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses auth method (API Key), ACL permission, and rate limit (100/path/s globally), which are beyond the tool name. However, it doesn't mention if the query is read-only or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences plus three bullet points) and front-loaded with the purpose. The extra operational details are useful but could be integrated more concisely. No unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description fails to mention what the tool returns (min/max limits). It also doesn't explain why one would query limits (e.g., before a conversion). The 5 parameters are only partially addressed, leaving gaps for an agent to interpret.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description only vaguely mentions 'coin pair' and 'account type'. It does not explain the meaning of fromCoinType and toCoinType enums (0/1) or clarify that the limits are min/max quantitatively. The description adds little value over parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'query single conversion min/max limit for specified coin pair under specified account type', specifying the verb (query), resource (conversion limit), and scope (single pair, account type). It distinguishes from sibling tools like ConvertExecute and ConvertHistoryQuery.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes authentication, permission, and rate limit info but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide usage conditions like prerequisites or when-to-avoid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.