recEasyBotStrategy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It includes a rate limit (20 rps) which adds transparency. However, it does not explicitly state that the tool is read-only (no side effects). The behavioral info is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is 8 sentences, front-loaded with purpose, then rate limit, then agent hint. No wasted words. Slightly verbose in the rate limit formatting, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description lacks completeness. It does not specify the structure of the returned strategy or enumerate possible biz values. The agent would need external knowledge to fully interpret the response for downstream create endpoints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must explain parameters. It mentions symbol, product, and direction as a triple but does not decode enum values (e.g., product '0' vs '1'). This leaves the agent without full understanding of parameter ranges. Some high-level meaning is provided but insufficient for precise invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it returns a recommended strategy and bot business type for a given triple, explicitly distinguishing its role in the EasyBot one-click create flow. The agent hint reinforces when to use it versus alternatives, making purpose very specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit agent hint says 'Use this when the user wants the simplest path to create a bot', providing clear when-to-use guidance. It also describes the input and output flow, and implies not to use when more complex configuration is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.