mcp_opendaw_set_clip_mute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It mentions the return value ('Returns success with old and new mute state') but does not disclose side effects, reversibility, permissions, or error behavior—only the obvious mute/unmute action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and well-structured: a one-line purpose, a parameter list, and a return-value note. Every sentence adds value with no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter tool, the description covers purpose, parameters, and return value. However, it lacks error handling, prerequisites, or any note about side effects, and with no annotations the agent gets no safety or behavioral context. The output schema exists but is not provided here, so the return note is useful; still, usage guidance gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description fully compensates by explaining each parameter: 'unit_index: AU index', 'track_index: Track index within the AU', 'clip_index: Clip index', and 'mute: True to mute, false to unmute'. This provides meaningful semantic guidance beyond bare types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Mute or unmute a clip in the session view' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like set_track_mute or set_region_mute by focusing on clips, and the parameter list reinforces the scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., track mute, region mute) or any exclusions. The description only states the operation and parameter meanings, leaving the agent without explicit context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.