mcp_opendaw_create_audio_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full transparency burden. It reveals that clips appear in the clip launcher, are independently triggerable, take sample_id from load_audio, and return a UUID and index. It does not address overwriting behavior or permissions, but provides some useful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with an intro, parameter list, and return note. Each sentence contributes either conceptual context or parameter clarification, with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 5 required params, no annotations, and the description covers purpose, all parameters, and return value. It omits edge behaviors like slot overwriting or prerequisites beyond sample_id, but is largely complete for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description compensates fully by explaining every parameter: sample_id's source, unit_index default, clip_index slot semantics, track_index default, and bpm's purpose for warp markers. This is strong added value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Create'), names the resource ('audio clip'), and locates it in the session view / clip launcher. It further contrasts with audio regions, distinguishing it from related tools like place_audio_region.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains that clips are session-view counterparts to audio regions, implying when to use this over arrangement-view region tools. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or exclusion conditions, so it stops at clear context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.