mcp_opendaw_clone_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the core behavior: cloning a clip and the optional consolidation that makes the event collection independent (not shared). It also mentions the return value (success or error). While it doesn't cover reversibility or side effects on the original clip, it goes beyond the schema and offers meaningful behavioral insights.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded: it opens with the main action and then provides a clean, structured parameter list. Every sentence adds value, with no repetition of schema details or unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity, the description covers the operation, parameters, and return behavior. An output schema is present, so detailed return values need not be described. The description is complete for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides explicit, meaningful explanations for all parameters: unit_index is an AU index, track_index is within the AU, clip_index is the clip to clone, and consolidate controls whether the clone gets its own independent event collection. This is far more informative than the minimal type/title info in the schema, which has 0% coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: cloning a clip (note or value) on the same track. It uses a specific verb (clone) and resource (clip), and distinguishes it from other clip operations like delete, list, or set properties.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context that this tool is used for cloning a clip onto the same track, with optional consolidation. It explains each parameter, giving the agent enough context to determine when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.