kaiten_list_sd_template_answers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only restates the action ('List') and the resource, without disclosing whether the result is paginated, scoped to a service, or requires particular permissions. The verb implies a read-only operation, but no additional behavioral context is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no filler. It is fully front-loaded and every word carries meaning, making it highly concise for a parameter-less list operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameter-free list operation, the description is mostly complete. However, with no output schema and no annotations, it misses useful context such as the shape of the returned list or any filtering scope. An agent can call it correctly, but might not know what to expect in the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the input schema fully covers parameter semantics. The description does not need to add parameter details, and the baseline 4 for a parameter-free tool applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('List') and a specific resource ('Service Desk template answers'), making the operation clear. It is distinguishable from sibling tools like kaiten_get_sd_template_answer or kaiten_list_sd_requests, though the description relies on the resource name rather than explicitly differentiating scope or behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool instead of alternatives. There is no mention of use cases, exclusions, or related tools such as kaiten_get_sd_template_answer or kaiten_create_sd_template_answer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.