kaiten_get_space_sla_measurements

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Get,' implying a read operation, but doesn't disclose return format, pagination, potential errors, or whether it aggregates across all cards. There is no mention of what 'measurements' includes or any side effects. The behavior is under-specified for an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no waste. It is concise and directly states the action. However, it is not front-loaded with any additional context beyond the basic purpose, and it could have included more value in the same space, so it's not a perfect 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is straightforward with one parameter, and the schema covers that, but there is no output schema and the description doesn't explain what SLA rule measurements are, what the response looks like, or edge cases (e.g., empty spaces). An agent has insufficient context to confidently invoke and interpret the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the space_id parameter is already documented. The description adds no extra meaning beyond affirming the context ('space'), which aligns with the parameter. Since the schema handles the semantic load, a baseline of 3 is appropriate; no additional value is contributed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action (get) and resource (SLA rule measurements for all cards in a space). It distinguishes from per-card operations by specifying 'all cards in a space.' However, the term 'SLA rule measurements' is somewhat opaque, and it doesn't clarify the difference from other SLA-related siblings beyond the 'space' scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The sibling kaiten_get_card_sla_measurements suggests a per-card counterpart, but the description doesn't mention it or any other condition for choosing this tool over others. No when/not or alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.