kaiten_delete_sd_template_answer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description transparently identifies this as a destructive operation targeting a specific resource, which is the core behavioral trait. However, with no annotations provided, it does not mention whether the deletion is permanent, requires special permissions, or has side effects, leaving some behavioral ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no filler, and the operation and resource are front-loaded. This is appropriate for a tool with one simple parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter delete operation, the description plus schema is largely sufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly. It would be slightly stronger if it noted irreversibility or authorization requirements, but these are not essential for basic invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description covers 100% of the single parameter, already identifying it as a template_answer_id UUID. The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the operation ('Delete') and the exact resource ('Service Desk template answer'). This matches the tool name and distinguishes it from the many sibling operations on the same resource, such as create, update, get, and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives like update, get, or create. The only signal is the verb 'Delete', which is implicit usage information rather than explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.