kaiten_create_document_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only says the group is created. It does not mention permissions, side effects, reversibility, or what happens when parent_entity_uid or sort_order are omitted, despite the schema hinting at auto-generation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, accurate sentence with no filler and the key action is front-loaded. It is efficient, though the economy comes at the cost of behavioral and usage detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is thin: it omits when to use it, what a document group's place in the hierarchy is, and what the response will be. The schema explains parameters but not the operation's context or consequences.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so title, sort_order, and parent_entity_uid are already documented. The description adds no parameter-level nuance beyond the schema, which is acceptable under the baseline for fully covered schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: 'Create a new Kaiten document group.' This clearly identifies the operation and distinguishes it from create_document or create_company_group siblings, though it does not explicitly explain what a document group is or when it should be preferred over related group tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no mention of whether a parent group or space is required. The description only restates the operation and leaves usage context entirely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.