kaiten_get_sd_template_answer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only states the operation ('Get') and gives no additional behavioral context such as read-only guarantees, authentication requirements, error behavior, or what is returned. This is a minimal disclosure with no value beyond the tool's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence that states the action, resource, and lookup key with no wasted words. For a one-parameter retrieval tool, this is appropriately sized and immediately scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a very simple one-parameter retrieval operation, the description is nearly complete. Since there is no output schema, a note on the return format would add value, but 'Get X by ID' is generally sufficient guidance for an agent to invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents the only parameter. The description adds no extra semantic detail beyond 'by ID', which is appropriate as a baseline but not an enhancement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get'), names the exact resource ('Service Desk template answer'), and adds the key qualifier ('by ID'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like kaiten_list_sd_template_answers, kaiten_create_sd_template_answer, and kaiten_delete_sd_template_answer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the use case: retrieve a single template answer when you already have its ID. However, it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over listing template answers or how to obtain the ID if missing, leaving usage guidance largely implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.