kaiten_delete_external_link

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the deletion action without disclosing permanent side effects, failure conditions, permission requirements, or consequences. The word 'delete' implies destructiveness, but no additional behavioral context is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no fluff, filler, or repetition. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, and every word contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter delete tool with fully documented parameters, the description is mostly sufficient. It clearly states what is deleted and from where, but a note about permanence or how to obtain the link_id (e.g., via kaiten_list_external_links) would make it fully complete. The absence of an output schema is not a gap here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full descriptions for both parameters ('Card ID' and 'External link ID'), and the description adds no additional parameter-level meaning. Since schema_description_coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 applies and the description neither enhances nor detracts from parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Delete'), a specific resource ('external link'), and a location ('from a Kaiten card'). This clearly distinguishes the tool from sibling tools like kaiten_create_external_link, kaiten_update_external_link, and other deletion tools such as kaiten_delete_card.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied by the verb and resource, but the description does not explicitly state when to use this tool or mention alternatives such as kaiten_list_external_links for finding the link_id. No when-not-to-use guidance or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.