smartsuite_update_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only have readOnlyHint: false, so the description carries the full burden. It clearly indicates this is a write operation, explains the replace behavior for each configuration window, and states validation of field slugs. It also mentions the environment variable requirement. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a few sentences but each adds value. It is front-loaded with the main purpose and then covers requirements, behavior, and exclusions. Could be slightly more concise but is well-structured and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 8 parameters, only one required, no output schema, and nested objects set to false, the description covers when to use, prerequisites, partial update behavior, validation, and what the tool does not handle. It also guides the agent to use other tools for viewId discovery. This is comprehensive for a complex update tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds useful context beyond schema: it explains that passing sort replaces the sort rules entirely, and that filterOperator defaults to 'and'. It also mentions field slugs are validated, which is not in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a view/report, listing specific configurable attributes (label, description, visibleFields, filters, sort, groupBy). It distinguishes from siblings by explicitly stating it refuses forms/dashboards and directs to their own tools, which is a strong differentiator.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit prerequisites (readwrite/admin mode + SMARTSUITE_ENABLE_SCHEMA_WRITE=true), explains partial update semantics ('Only the parts you pass are changed'), and suggests using other tools to gather viewId and current settings. It also notes that field slugs are validated and that forms/dashboards are handled by separate tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.