smartsuite_describe_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description details the configuration components returned (filters, sort, etc.), adding behavioral context beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. No output schema exists, but the listed items give a good sense of the response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first states the purpose and lists outputs, the second gives a usage hint. No unnecessary words, efficiently front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with well-documented parameters and annotations, the description covers purpose, output components, and a prerequisite step (list_views). It is complete for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for both parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add parameter-specific details beyond the schema, but it implies the role of viewId and references list_views for obtaining it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets the full configuration for a single SmartSuite view, listing specific components (filters, sort, group-by, etc.). It distinguishes from sibling tools like smartsuite_list_views and the create/update/delete view tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises to use smartsuite_list_views to find view IDs, providing a prerequisite. It could also mention when not to use this tool (e.g., if only needing a list of views), but the guidance is clear and helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.