smartsuite_create_solution

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses behavioral traits beyond annotations: requires specific mode and environment variable (readwrite/admin mode, SMARTSUITE_ENABLE_SCHEMA_WRITE=true), explains that the server assigns slug, default logo, and permissions, and details the dry-run preview unless confirm:true. This adds significant context missing from annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise and front-loaded. The first sentence states the core action and prerequisites. Subsequent sentences add essential details about required/optional parameters, related tools, and confirm flag behavior. Every sentence contributes meaning without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description adequately covers the creation process, permissions, and usage pattern. It could optionally mention what a dry-run preview returns, but overall it is sufficiently complete for an agent to invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers all parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description adds value by clarifying that only name is required, that logoIcon and logoColor are optional, and explaining the confirm parameter's effect (dry-run vs actual creation). This provides context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new solution' with specific action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools by referencing smartsuite_create_application for adding tables, and includes necessary context like permission requirements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that only a name is required, optional parameters (logoIcon, logoColor), and the dry-run behavior controlled by the confirm flag. It also mentions that tables are added via another tool (smartsuite_create_application), providing usage guidance. However, it does not explicitly state when to use or avoid this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.