smartsuite_update_layout_tab

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only readOnlyHint=false in annotations, the description fully discloses key behaviors: requires schema-write permission, dry-run preview unless confirm:true, and the ability to clear description by passing empty string. This significantly aids agent decision-making.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, each adding distinct value: operation, permission, and behavioral note. No fluff, front-loaded with essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately complete for a mutation tool with no output schema. Covers permission, preview mode, and clearing description. Could mention error handling or side effects of reordering, but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter is well-described. The description adds minimal new semantic information beyond grouping the parameters. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a record-view tab, specifies the updatable attributes (name, description, position, style/align), and uses the tab id. It differentiates from sibling tools like add_layout_tab and remove_layout_tab by focusing on update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: requires schema-write, dry-run unless confirm:true. However, it does not explicitly exclude other tools or mention when to use alternatives like add_layout_tab or remove_layout_tab.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.