smartsuite_add_layout_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint: false), the description adds critical behavioral details: it is a write operation, requires specific permissions, defaults to preview unless confirm:true, and explains how sections group subsequent fields. This goes well beyond the annotation, though it doesn't cover side effects like order changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately concise and well-structured, starting with purpose, then requirements, then behavior and parameter usage. Each sentence adds value, but it could be slightly more compact without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 8 parameters, the description covers the tool's purpose, effect, parameter usage, and prerequisites. It is complete enough for an agent to use the tool correctly, though it does not describe return values (acceptable without output schema).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds meaningful context for key parameters like afterField (placement logic), confirm (dry-run vs apply), and tabId (layout targeting). This enhances understanding beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Add a section (a labeled grouping) to an application's record-view layout,' specifying the verb (add), resource (section), and target (record-view layout). It distinguishes from siblings like smartsuite_update_layout_section by focusing on addition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions prerequisites (readwrite/admin mode, SMARTSUITE_ENABLE_SCHEMA_WRITE) and explains positioning behavior, but does not explicitly guide when to use this versus alternatives like update_layout_section or remove_layout_section. It provides context but lacks direct when-to-use/when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.