wordpress_wc_get_orders
wordpress_wc_get_ordersRetrieve WooCommerce orders from your WordPress site with customizable filtering options.
Instructions
Get WooCommerce orders with filtering
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
wordpress_wc_get_ordersRetrieve WooCommerce orders from your WordPress site with customizable filtering options.
Get WooCommerce orders with filtering
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It claims 'with filtering' but the input schema has zero parameters, making this claim unsupported and potentially misleading. No mention of pagination, sorting, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short, but lacks critical information. Efficiency is undermined by omission; a single sentence is insufficient for a data retrieval tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no parameter details, the description fails to explain what data is returned, how filtering works, or any limits. Incomplete for a WooCommerce orders endpoint.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0 parameters, so description adds no parameter details. Baseline is 4 for zero params, but the vague 'with filtering' is not substantiated and may confuse, lowering the score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'WooCommerce orders', and mentions filtering. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like wordpress_wc_get_products or wordpress_wc_get_customers, which also retrieve specific WooCommerce entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or contextual cues. The agent is left to infer usage from the name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RaheesAhmed/wordpress-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server