wordpress_create_term
wordpress_create_termAdd a new term to a specified taxonomy on your WordPress site.
Instructions
Create a new term in a taxonomy
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taxonomy | Yes | ||
| name | Yes |
wordpress_create_termAdd a new term to a specified taxonomy on your WordPress site.
Create a new term in a taxonomy
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taxonomy | Yes | ||
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It only says 'Create a new term' without detailing side effects, required permissions, or the structure of the term created. The description does not contradict missing annotations, but it is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise, but it borders on under-specification. It could be expanded with essential details without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should compensate by explaining the return value, required inputs, and usage context. It fails to do so, leaving the agent with insufficient information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage; the parameters 'taxonomy' and 'name' are not explained beyond their names. The description adds no meaning, leaving the agent to guess formats or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Create a new term in a taxonomy', which indicates the action and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like create_category or create_tag, which are more specific types of term creation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_category or create_tag. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context hints given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RaheesAhmed/wordpress-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server