wordpress_delete_menu
wordpress_delete_menuDelete a WordPress navigation menu by providing its menu ID and whether to force deletion.
Instructions
Delete a navigation menu
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| menuId | Yes | ||
| force | Yes |
wordpress_delete_menuDelete a WordPress navigation menu by providing its menu ID and whether to force deletion.
Delete a navigation menu
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| menuId | Yes | ||
| force | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations present, the description carries full burden. It only states the action without explaining side effects (e.g., whether deleting a menu also deletes its items or requires permissions). No behavioral details beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely brief but under-specified. True conciseness would include essential details within a compact format; here it sacrifices clarity for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple input schema and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It fails to specify what happens upon success/failure, the role of 'force', or any side effects on associated menu items.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description does not explain the two parameters ('menuId' and 'force'). The meaning of 'force' is critical for safe use but remains ambiguous.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a navigation menu' clearly states the action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_menu', 'get_menus', and 'update_menu_item' by specifying the delete operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'delete_menu_item'). There is no mention of prerequisites, contexts, or which tool to use for partial deletions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RaheesAhmed/wordpress-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server