wordpress_get_post
wordpress_get_postRetrieve detailed information about any WordPress post by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Get detailed information about a specific post by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes |
wordpress_get_postRetrieve detailed information about any WordPress post by providing its unique ID.
Get detailed information about a specific post by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or what 'detailed information' entails. The tool is a read operation, but this is not explicitly stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and easy to read, but could benefit from slightly more detail without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it does not explain what constitutes 'detailed information', leaving an agent uncertain about the return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only mentions 'by ID' without elaborating on the parameter. The parameter 'postId' is not described beyond being required, and no context about expected format or constraints is given.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get detailed information') and the resource ('a specific post by ID'). It distinguishes from siblings like wordpress_get_posts by specifying 'by ID', implying a single post retrieval.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like wordpress_get_posts, wordpress_get_page, etc. The description does not mention when to choose this over alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RaheesAhmed/wordpress-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server