wordpress_create_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for disclosing behavioral traits. It only states 'Create a comment on a post,' failing to mention consequences like approval requirements, authentication needs, potential errors, or response details. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at one sentence, which is efficient, but it sacrifices necessary detail. While it front-loads the core action, it omits parameter descriptions and usage context, making it insufficiently informative despite its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has two required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly inadequate. It does not explain what the tool returns, error conditions, or any behavioral nuances, leaving the agent with dangerously incomplete information for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, meaning the property definitions 'postId' and 'content' lack any textual explanation. The tool description does not compensate by explaining what these parameters represent (e.g., the WordPress post ID format, content restrictions), leaving the agent without semantic context to correctly populate them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description directly states the action 'Create a comment on a post,' using a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'wordpress_get_comments' (retrieval), 'wordpress_update_comment' (modification), and 'wordpress_delete_comment' (deletion), leaving no ambiguity about its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to create a new comment versus updating or deleting an existing one. It lacks context about prerequisites, typical scenarios, or any conditional advice, leaving the agent without decision-making support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.