wordpress_optimize_database

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It does not explain what 'optimize' entails (e.g., repair, defragment, index rebuild), whether it is safe on live sites, or if it requires administrator privileges. Potential side effects are unstated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, concise sentence that conveys the main purpose. However, it may be too terse, omitting useful details without becoming verbose. Front-loaded with action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given lack of output schema and annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not clarify the difference from wordpress_cleanup_database, nor does it hint at return values or confirmation. Sibling tools like wordpress_cleanup_database are similar but undefined here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so there is nothing to document. The description correctly implies no configuration is needed. Baseline 4 applies as no parameter explanation is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'optimize' and the resource 'all database tables' with purpose 'for better performance'. It distinguishes from similar tools like wordpress_cleanup_database (which focuses on removing obsolete data) and wordpress_backup_database (backup).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use or avoid this tool. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., backup before optimization), frequency, or alternatives. The agent receives no context on best practices or competing tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.