wordpress_get_menus
wordpress_get_menusRetrieve all navigation menus from a WordPress site. Use this tool to list menus for customization or display.
Instructions
Get all navigation menus
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
wordpress_get_menusRetrieve all navigation menus from a WordPress site. Use this tool to list menus for customization or display.
Get all navigation menus
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Input schema / $schemaAdded value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must carry the burden of disclosing behavior. It implies a read-only operation by using 'Get', but does not state permissions, return format, or possible limitations. Minimal but not misleading.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that is immediately understandable and contains no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (0 params, no output schema), the description is largely complete. It tells the agent exactly what the tool does, though it does not specify the response structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has 0 parameters, so the baseline for parameter semantics is 4. There is no schema to amplify, and the description's 'all' confirms no filtering.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get all navigation menus' clearly identifies the action (get) and the resource (all navigation menus). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like get_menu_items (menu items) and get_menu_locations (locations).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the sibling context implies it is for listing menus, the description itself does not mention exclusions or alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.