Skip to main content
Glama

wordpress_delete_menu_item

wordpress_delete_menu_item

Delete a menu item from a WordPress site using its item ID. Use the force parameter to bypass the trash.

Instructions

Delete a menu item

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemIdYes
forceYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.0.0
    • addedInput schema / $schema
      Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'delete' without mentioning irreversibility, the effect of 'force', or any side effects such as cascading deletions. This is minimal and lacks valuable context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no superfluous words. It efficiently communicates the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and two required parameters left unexplained, the description is underspecified. An agent cannot infer the meaning of 'force', potential prerequisites, or any confirmation of deletion, making the tool risky to invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the parameters 'itemId' or 'force'. The agent is left to guess what 'force' does or how 'itemId' relates to menu items, making correct invocation uncertain.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a menu item' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the tool's function. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like wordpress_delete_menu (which deletes an entire menu) and wordpress_update_menu_item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites or contexts. It simply restates the action without explaining the role of the 'force' parameter or when a forced delete is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools