put_wifi_planning

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is contradictory (GET vs PUT) and lacks behavioral details such as whether the tool is destructive, idempotent, or requires certain prerequisites. Error codes are listed but do not compensate for the missing transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains a major verb conflict that undermines its usefulness. The error code list is not concise and could be better structured or moved to separate documentation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema (not shown), the description fails to explain the tool's action, required conditions, or expected outcome. It is incomplete for a tool with 4 optional parameters and a PUT operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters have descriptions in the input schema (100% coverage), so the schema already provides their meaning. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond listing error codes, which are not tied to specific parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Get the list of WifiChannelUsage for the given AP', which directly contradicts the PUT verb in the tool name. It does not state that the tool updates or creates a wifi planning entry, making the purpose misleading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include get_wifi_planning and put_parental_filter_id_planning, but the description offers no differentiation or context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.