put_lan_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions 'Update' and lists error codes, but fails to state that it modifies state, the nature of changes (partial vs full), authentication requirements, or side effects. Error codes are helpful but insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: one line for purpose followed by a list of error codes. It avoids redundancy and is front-loaded. However, the error codes could be better integrated or explained, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 optional parameters and an output schema, the description is minimal but covers updating the config and possible errors. It does not explain return values (output schema exists) or provide richer context about LanConfig. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is described in the input schema. The tool description adds no extra meaning for parameters, but the listed error codes provide some context about potential failures. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update the current LanConfig', specifying the verb (update) and resource (LanConfig). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'get_lan_config' (read) and other 'put_' tools for different resources. The error codes provide additional context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage is for updating LAN configuration but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No prerequisites or context are provided. The presence of 'get_lan_config' suggests a read counterpart, but no direct comparison is made.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.