get_storage_partition_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description adds error codes which inform about failure modes. However, it does not disclose read-only nature, authorization needs, or any side effects. The error codes provide modest transparency beyond a bare statement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one line for purpose, one line for error codes. Front-loaded with the key action. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return value explanation is not required. The error codes add completeness, but the missing parameter clarification and absence of usage context (e.g., relationship to get_storage_partition) leave gaps. Adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain what the 'id' parameter represents (e.g., format, prefix, or source). It merely says 'given id', providing no additional meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a specific DiskPartition by ID, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_storage_partition (list all partitions) or get_storage_disk_id (disk level).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_storage_partition for listing all partitions). No exclusion criteria or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.