put_downloads_feeds_feed_id_items_item_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'Returns' implying a read operation, but PUT typically mutates. No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden but fails to disclose mutation, permissions, or side effects. It directly contradicts the HTTP method implied by the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but the single sentence is misleading about the tool's behavior. Error codes are listed but do not compensate for the incorrect purpose. The structure does not front-load a correct verb-resource combination.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description fails to convey that this is an update tool (PUT) and incorrectly describes it as a return operation. Considering the complexity (14 parameters, output schema exists) and lack of annotations, the description is severely incomplete and inaccurate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 86%, so the input schema already describes parameters well. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema, meeting baseline expectations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Returns the collection of all DownloadFeedItems for a given DownloadFeed,' which describes a GET operation, but the tool name starts with 'put_' indicating an update. This contradiction makes the purpose unclear and misleading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_downloads_feeds_feed_id_items' (GET). The description does not clarify its role as an update operation, leaving the agent without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.