delete_upnpigd_redir_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description must cover behavioral traits. It only mentions the destructive action and two error codes, lacking details on permissions, side effects, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with one line and error codes, but lacks necessary detail. Conciseness is valued, but not at the expense of missing critical information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the description is still incomplete. It does not describe the return value (output schema exists but not detailed) and provides no context on success/failure behavior beyond error codes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and description does not explain the 'id' parameter (e.g., its format or source). The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Deletes the given UPnPRedir', clearly indicating action and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by being specific to UPnP redirect, but does not differentiate from similar tools like delete_fw_redir_redir_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Error codes hint at failure conditions but provide no context for appropriate usage or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.