get_storage_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry full transparency. It helpfully lists error codes (e.g., not_found, invalid_disk), which alerts the agent to possible failures. However, it does not mention other behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication requirements, or that it is a read-only operation (implied by 'get' but not explicitly stated).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: a single-purpose statement followed by a list of error codes. There is no wasted text. It is front-loaded with the purpose, and the error codes are clearly separated. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown but indicated), the description does not need to explain return values. However, it omits context about what StorageConfig represents or its relationship to other storage entities. The error codes add some completeness, but the overall context is minimal for an agent to fully understand when to invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter information. It correctly avoids extraneous detail, and the lack of parameters is clear from both the schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves 'the StorageConfig'. The verb 'Get' and resource name directly convey the action. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_storage_disk or get_storage_partition, leaving ambiguity about what exactly StorageConfig encompasses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only states what it does and lists error codes, but does not specify context, prerequisites, or when it should not be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.