get_downloads_id_log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only lists error codes without describing the tool's behavior, side effects, or what the log contains. It adds no behavioral context beyond the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely terse, but the long list of error codes is not well-structured and does not compensate for the lack of meaningful content. Every sentence could be more informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema and many sibling tools, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain the log's content, how to interpret the error codes, or what the tool returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of the 'id' parameter. The tool requires one parameter, but its purpose and format are not clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get the log' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name without specifying what log is being retrieved or for which resource. It does not distinguish this tool from siblings like get_downloads_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. There is no indication of when to use this tool versus other get_* tools, such as get_downloads_id or get_vpn_client_log.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.