put_wifi_bss_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It only lists error codes, which hint at possible failures but do not disclose side effects, permissions, mutability, or idempotency. The 'Update' verb implies mutation, but no details are given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but not optimally structured. The action is front-loaded, but the error code list is lengthy and could be separated. It conveys minimal information without being succinctly helpful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (6 parameters, nested objects, output schema), the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the tool's role among similar put_* tools, the significance of error codes, or what the output represents. The error codes list is useful but insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is in the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Update the WifiAp', but the tool name is 'put_wifi_bss_id', creating confusion about what exactly is updated (BSS ID vs. WifiAp). The purpose is vague and not clearly differentiated from sibling tools like put_wifi_ap_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as put_wifi_ap_id or put_wifi_config. The description provides no context for selecting this tool over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.