get_dhcp_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description states it returns config but does not explicitly state it is read-only or non-destructive. The error code list provides some insight into failure modes but lacks behavioral context like idempotency or safety.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the purpose. Error codes are listed separately. It is efficient but could be slightly more detailed without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that no parameters exist and an output schema is present, the description is adequately complete. It tells what the tool does and lists relevant error codes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters. Schema coverage is 100% (trivially). The description adds no parameter meaning because none exist. Per rules, baseline 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Returns the current DhcpConfig', clearly indicating the verb (returns) and resource (DhcpConfig). The name 'get_dhcp_config' further clarifies it's a read operation. The tool is distinct from DHCP lease tools like get_dhcp_dynamic_lease.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., get_dhcp_dynamic_lease). No prerequisites, context, or exclusions provided. The description is purely functional.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.