put_dhcp_static_lease_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only lists possible error codes, which is partially transparent but omits side effects, auth requirements, or whether the operation is destructive. The error codes hint at potential failures but lack context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line of error codes), but this is underspecification, not conciseness. It fails to provide any meaningful information about the tool's purpose or usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, nested body parameter, and many sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the tool's role, input semantics, or appropriate contexts, making it nearly useless for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has two parameters (id and body) with 0% schema description coverage. The description adds no explanation of what 'id' represents (likely the lease ID) or what 'body' contains (lease properties). This is a critical gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only lists error codes and does not state the tool's purpose. It fails to indicate that this tool updates a DHCP static lease, which is essential for an agent to understand its function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'post_dhcp_static_lease' or 'delete_dhcp_static_lease_id'. The context for usage is entirely absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.