send_pedals_command

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only mentions sending a command and returning acknowledgment. It omits important behavioral details such as side effects on vehicle motion, safety considerations, or whether the command is asynchronous.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences plus a structured argument list. Every word serves a purpose, no redundant or superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema existing, the description does not explain the return value beyond 'Command acknowledgment'. It lacks context about real-world effects, error conditions, or usage constraints, making it incomplete for a command tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description merely repeats the schema's parameter descriptions ('Throttle position (0-1)', 'Brake position (0-1)'). No additional semantics beyond the schema are provided, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Send pedals control command' clearly indicating the verb and resource. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like send_acceleration_command or send_steering_command, but the specific resource (pedals) provides sufficient distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as send_acceleration_command or send_velocity_command. The description lacks context about typical scenarios or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.