Skip to main content
Glama

list-my-calendar-permissions

list-my-calendar-permissions
Read-only

Lists who can access your primary Outlook calendar, showing roles like read, write, or delegate. Identify and manage sharing permissions directly via Microsoft Graph.

Instructions

The permissions of the users with whom the calendar is shared.

💡 TIP: Lists share recipients and delegates on the user's primary calendar. Returns calendarPermission objects with id, role ('none' | 'freeBusyRead' | 'limitedRead' | 'read' | 'write' | 'delegateWithoutPrivateEventAccess' | 'delegateWithPrivateEventAccess' | 'custom'), emailAddress { name, address }, isInsideOrganization, isRemovable, allowedRoles. Returns an empty collection when called by a delegate or share recipient (only the calendar owner sees the full list). For a non-primary calendar, use /me/calendars/{calendar-id}/calendarPermissions — not currently exposed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNoPage size (Graph $top). Start small (e.g. 5–15) so responses fit the model context; raise only if needed. Use $select to return fewer fields per item. For more rows, use @odata.nextLink from the response instead of a very large $top.
skipNoItems to skip for pagination. Not supported with $search.
countNoSet true to enable advanced query mode (ConsistencyLevel: eventual). Required for complex $filter on flag/flagStatus or contains().
expandNoNavigation properties to inline, e.g. attachments on a message or event. Only navigation properties can be expanded: expanding a non-navigation property such as a message body fails with "Parsing OData Select and Expand failed", and an unsupported value may be ignored rather than reported. Request ordinary fields with $select instead.
filterNoOData filter expression. Add $count=true for advanced filters (flag/flagStatus, contains()). Cannot combine with $search.
searchNoKQL search query — wrap value in double quotes. Cannot combine with $filter.
selectNoComma-separated fields to return, e.g. id,subject,from,receivedDateTime
orderbyNoSort expression, e.g. receivedDateTime desc
fetchAllPagesNoFollow @odata.nextLink and merge up to 100 pages into one response. Can return enormous payloads—only when the user explicitly needs a full export. Prefer a small $top first, then paginate or narrow with $filter/$search.
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and destructiveHint, but the description adds valuable context: the empty return for delegates/share recipients and the note that only the owner sees the full list. It also enumerates returned fields, exceeding annotation-only disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph with a clear lead sentence and additional useful details. It is moderately sized but not bloated; the field list adds length but provides needed context for a tool without an output schema. The structure is logical with the core purpose first.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description's enumeration of returned fields is essential and well-covered. It also addresses edge cases (delegate view) and the alternative for non-primary calendars, making the tool's capabilities and limitations clear. Pagination is implied via parameters, so no significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description's tip about using small $top and $select is already present in the parameter descriptions, so it adds little meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the verb 'list' and the resource 'calendar permissions', specifying it covers users with whom the calendar is shared. It differentiates from siblings by scoping to the primary calendar, and the mention of the non-primary alternative shows awareness of tool boundaries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States that for non-primary calendars an alternative endpoint exists but is not exposed, and notes the empty-collection behavior for delegates/share recipients. This provides practical context for when the tool is appropriate, though it doesn't explicitly compare with sibling permission tools like create/update/delete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/A-Impact-Pavel/ms365-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server