Skip to main content
Glama

list-focused-inbox-overrides

list-focused-inbox-overrides
Read-only

List user-defined Focused Inbox overrides that force messages from specific senders into Focused or Other folders, bypassing automatic classification.

Instructions

Get the overrides that a user has set up to always classify messages from certain senders in specific ways. Each override corresponds to an SMTP address of a sender. Initially, a user doesn't have any overrides.

💡 TIP: Lists Focused Inbox classification overrides — explicit rules that force messages from a given sender (by SMTP address) into either the Focused or Other tab, regardless of what the Outlook ML classifier would predict. Each override has id, classifyAs ('focused' or 'other'), and senderEmailAddress {name, address}. Returns an empty collection if the user has never set an override.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNoPage size (Graph $top). Start small (e.g. 5–15) so responses fit the model context; raise only if needed. Use $select to return fewer fields per item. For more rows, use @odata.nextLink from the response instead of a very large $top.
skipNoItems to skip for pagination. Not supported with $search.
countNoSet true to enable advanced query mode (ConsistencyLevel: eventual). Required for complex $filter on flag/flagStatus or contains().
expandNoNavigation properties to inline, e.g. attachments on a message or event. Only navigation properties can be expanded: expanding a non-navigation property such as a message body fails with "Parsing OData Select and Expand failed", and an unsupported value may be ignored rather than reported. Request ordinary fields with $select instead.
filterNoOData filter expression. Add $count=true for advanced filters (flag/flagStatus, contains()). Cannot combine with $search.
searchNoKQL search query — wrap value in double quotes. Cannot combine with $filter.
selectNoComma-separated fields to return, e.g. id,subject,from,receivedDateTime
orderbyNoSort expression, e.g. receivedDateTime desc
fetchAllPagesNoFollow @odata.nextLink and merge up to 100 pages into one response. Can return enormous payloads—only when the user explicitly needs a full export. Prefer a small $top first, then paginate or narrow with $filter/$search.
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and destructiveHint, so the description adds value by explaining the empty-collection return case and detailing the return structure (id, classifyAs, senderEmailAddress). It also clarifies the semantic effect on message classification, which is beyond the annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with the core purpose in the first sentence and a detailed tip that adds useful specifics without being verbose. The structure is well-organized, though the tip slightly overlaps with the first paragraph in explaining the concept.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the comprehensive schema and annotations, the description completes the picture by specifying the return object structure and the empty-collection behavior. It does not cover every edge case (e.g., pagination details are in schema), but it is sufficient for an agent to call the tool correctly in most scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides thorough descriptions for all 11 parameters (100% coverage), so the description does not need to elaborate on parameter usage. The tool description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema offers, which aligns with the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get the overrides') and the resource (focused inbox overrides), and explains what an override is. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create/update/delete by focusing on retrieval. The mention that each override corresponds to an SMTP address adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies its use case (checking which overrides exist) and notes the initial empty state, but it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it. While siblings for mutation are obvious from their names, the tool lacks direct guidance on when to choose it over them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/A-Impact-Pavel/ms365-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server