update_last_made

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavior. It indicates an update operation but does not explain semantics (e.g., whether it overwrites or appends the timestamp) or side effects. The detail is minimal but not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description includes redundant elements like the tool name and HTTP path, taking three lines for a simple concept. It could be more concise by stating only the operational purpose, removing the duplicate title and path.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimally complete for a simple timestamp update, but it lacks information about required permissions, return value, or potential errors. Without a output schema, the agent is left guessing what the response looks like.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must clarify parameter meanings. It only mentions the timestamp implicitly in the action, but does not explain the 'slug' parameter (recipe identifier) or the structure of the request body. This leaves ambiguity for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action: 'Update a recipe's last made timestamp.' This precisely identifies the resource and verb, distinguishing it from sibling tools that handle favorites, ratings, or other recipe modifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or exclusions, and fails to differentiate usage scenarios such as updating vs. creating a last-made entry.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.