households_mealplans_delete_one

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It says 'Delete meal plan' and includes 'remove' and 'destroy' as keywords, implying it's a destructive, irreversible operation, but it doesn't state whether the deletion is permanent, whether it requires specific permissions, or what happens if the item_id doesn't exist. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core description is a single clear sentence, but it is followed by a repetitive and excessive keyword list that adds little value. The structure is front-loaded with the essential information, but the keyword bloat reduces conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a delete operation, missing annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description is incomplete. It should explain the consequences of deletion, error conditions, and any required permissions. The keyword list does not fill these gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the schema only defines 'item_id' as an integer with no description. The description implies that item_id is the identifier of the meal plan to delete but doesn't add any meaning beyond what the parameter name suggests. With one parameter and no schema descriptions, the description does not compensate for the lack of detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb+resource: 'Delete meal plan' with the REST endpoint DELETE /api/households/mealplans/{item_id}. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like households_mealplans_get_one and households_mealplans_update_one. However, the verbose keyword list adds noise rather than clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., whether the meal plan must exist), nor does it distinguish from other delete tools like households_shopping_lists_delete_one. The tool name and endpoint imply usage but no explicit context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.