recipe_comments_create_one

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention side effects (creation of a database record), required authentication, success/error responses, or any constraints. It completely fails to inform about tool behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

At 4 words, the description is very concise but at the expense of utility. It lacks structure and substance, making it under-specified rather than efficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 1 nested parameter, the description is woefully incomplete. It does not state that the tool creates a comment on a recipe, what the required fields are, or what the HTTP method implies. Sibling tools exist, but no differentiators are provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention any parameters or explain the meaning of 'recipeId' or 'text'. The description adds zero semantic value beyond the raw schema, leaving the agent without guidance on how to fill the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Create One' but does not explicitly state the resource being created (recipe comment). The name implies it, but the description is redundant and adds no clarity beyond the tool name. It does not distinguish from siblings like recipe_comments_get_one or recipe_comments_update_one beyond the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, no prerequisites, and no contrast with alternative tools (e.g., updating vs. creating). It leaves the agent fully in the dark about context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.