recipe_comments_get_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior, but it says nothing about pagination, default ordering, filtering capabilities (despite parameters for page, perPage, orderBy, etc.), or any side effects. The agent cannot infer the tool's impact or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but not usefully concise. It wastes the opportunity to convey critical information. Being brief is not beneficial when it omits essential guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to provide enough information for an AI agent to correctly invoke the tool or interpret its results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description provides no explanation of the 7 parameters (page, orderBy, perPage, queryFilter, orderDirection, paginationSeed, orderByNullPosition). The agent has no semantic guidance beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is 'Get All [GET /api/comments]', which is a tautology that restates the 'get all' part of the tool name without specifying what is being retrieved (recipe comments). It provides no differentiation from sibling tools like 'explore_categories_get_all' or 'recipe_crud_get_all'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'recipe_comments_get_one' or other 'get_all' tools. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.