households_event_notifications_get_one
Retrieve a specific household event notification by its unique ID.
Instructions
Get One [GET /api/households/events/notifications/{item_id}]
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes |
Retrieve a specific household event notification by its unique ID.
Get One [GET /api/households/events/notifications/{item_id}]
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention that the tool is read-only, requires authentication, or what happens if the item is missing. Simply stating the HTTP method is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (two lines) but under-specified. While it is front-loaded with 'Get One', it lacks essential details, making it inefficient rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, yet the description does not explain what the response contains (e.g., full notification object). It also omits context about household membership or permissions required. The description is incomplete for a standalone GET endpoint.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the required 'item_id' parameter. The agent must rely solely on the generic title 'Item Id' and UUID format, which is insufficient for understanding the parameter's role.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description says 'Get One' which relies on the tool name for context; it does not explicitly state that it retrieves a single household event notification. The resource and action are only implied by the name, not clarified in the description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_all or other sibling tools. No conditions, prerequisites, or distinctions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/2fst4u/mealie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server