parse_recipe_url_bulk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description must carry full burden. It mentions 'attempts to scrape' implying potential failure, but no details on side effects, destructive behavior, or what happens on success/failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences plus endpoint line are concise but lack critical details. Could be improved without increasing length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex nested schema and no output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, error handling, or the bulk operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It says 'Takes in a URL' but the schema has a nested body with an array of imports, each with url, tags, categories. The description does not explain the bulk nature or the optional tags/categories.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool parses a URL and scrapes data into the database, but it says 'a URL' while the schema expects an array of URLs (bulk). It does not differentiate from sibling tools like parse_recipe_url (singular) or test_parse_recipe_url.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like parse_recipe_url or test_parse_recipe_url. No context about prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.