organizer_tools_get_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It implies a read-only list operation via keywords, but says nothing about pagination behavior (page/perPage defaults), ordering semantics, the queryFilter syntax, or rate limits — significant gaps for an 8-parameter listing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is mostly a comma-separated keyword dump ('list tool, list tools, get tool, get tools, search tool...') rather than informative prose. The one useful sentence (endpoint path) is buried before the filler, so structure is poor even if length is not extreme.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 8 undocumented parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description leaves an agent without the information needed to filter or page results correctly. Only the endpoint path is a genuine addition.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Eight parameters with 0% schema description coverage and no mention of any of them in the description. page, perPage, search, orderBy, queryFilter, orderDirection, paginationSeed, and orderByNullPosition are entirely undocumented, so the agent must guess at semantics and formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb and resource ('Get All — Organizer: Tools. List tools') and gives the underlying endpoint. However, it does not distinguish itself from the near-identical sibling explore_tools_get_all, nor from organizer_tools_get_one, so an agent cannot tell scope apart from siblings without inspecting schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus explore_tools_get_all, organizer_tools_get_one, or organizer_tools_get_one_by_slug. The only hint is the keyword 'read-only', which is a label rather than usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.