get_ratings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Get Ratings' without revealing whether it requires authentication, if it is read-only (though implied), or any other behavioral traits such as rate limits or scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two lines) but includes an HTTP method and path that may be unnecessary for the agent. It is not verbose but could be more efficient by focusing solely on the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, and the description does not specify the format or contents of the response (e.g., list of rating objects or recipe IDs). Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter), the description is incomplete as it lacks details on expected output and usage boundaries.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the description must compensate. The only parameter 'id' is not explained beyond its type and format. The description says 'Get user's rated recipes,' which implies 'id' is a user ID, but this is not explicit. Additional context about the parameter's purpose is missing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get Ratings') and the resource ('user's rated recipes'). It is specific enough to distinguish from siblings like 'set_rating' (which sets a rating) and 'get_favorites' (which gets favorites). However, it redundantly repeats the title and purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it retrieves ratings for a specific user by ID, nor does it differentiate from 'get_logged_in_user_ratings' which gets the logged-in user's ratings. Siblings exist but no comparisons are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.