explore_recipes_get_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses no behavioral traits such as pagination, filtering behavior, required permissions, or side effects. Annotations are absent, so the description carries full burden but fails to provide any insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence plus an endpoint), but this is under-specification rather than conciseness. It lacks essential details and does not earn its place by providing useful content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high complexity (19 parameters, no schema descriptions, no output schema), the description is completely inadequate. It fails to provide even basic context needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 19 parameters and 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate but does not mention any parameter. It adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving agents unable to interpret parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get All' and the endpoint path clarify that the tool fetches all recipes for a group, but this is essentially a restatement of the tool name 'explore_recipes_get_all'. It minimally distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_recipe' or 'explore_recipes_suggest_recipes' but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No information is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'recipe_crud_get_all' or 'explore_recipes_suggest_recipes'. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.