households_mealplan_rules_delete_one

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only states 'Delete One' and the endpoint, not revealing behavioral aspects like irreversibility, permission requirements, or cascading effects. The destructive nature is implied but not clarified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, which is concise, but it lacks structure and fails to provide necessary details. Every sentence should earn its place; here, the two lines are minimal but not fully informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description should at least mention success behavior or error conditions. It is incomplete, lacking context like what happens on success or if the rule does not exist.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes item_id as a uuid4, but the description offers no additional meaning. Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate, but it does not explain the parameter's role or provide examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description includes the HTTP method and path, explicitly stating 'DELETE /api/households/mealplans/rules/{item_id}', which together with the tool name indicates it deletes a meal plan rule. However, 'Delete One' is somewhat vague without the resource context, but the endpoint clarifies it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like households_mealplan_rules_update_one or get_one. It does not specify prerequisites or when deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.